SC-100 · Domain 2: Design security operations, identity, and compliance capabilities · 28% of the exam
Task 2.2: Design solutions for identity and access management
Agent identities, access to SaaS, PaaS, IaaS, hybrid and multicloud resources, Microsoft Entra ID in hybrid estates, external identities, Conditional Access with continuous access evaluation, risk and protected actions, AD DS hardening, and secrets, keys and certificates.
Study it
Microsoft Entra ID for hybrid and multicloud; external and agent identities
Lesson coming
Conditional Access, continuous access evaluation, risk and protected actions
Try each one before opening the answer. Every option is explained, with the Microsoft documentation page that proves it.
Question 1 · choose 1
A company runs an autonomous AI agent with a Microsoft Entra Agent ID. It runs nightly with no signed-in user and calls an internal API to compile reports. Security wants access blocked whenever the agent is flagged as high risk. An existing Conditional Access policy for all users already blocks high-risk sign-ins. What should the design add?
ANothing, because the all-users policy already covers the agent
BA Conditional Access policy that targets the agent identity or its blueprint
CA policy targeting the agent's user account
DA sign-in frequency control for the employees who built the agent, so their sessions are reevaluated more often
Show the answer and why
ANothing, because the all-users policy already covers the agent
Incorrect
Policies that target users apply to delegated access; they don't cover an agent that accesses resources with its own identity.
BA Conditional Access policy that targets the agent identity or its blueprint
Correct
In app-only access the agent identity is the token subject, so the policy must target the agent identity or agent identity blueprint.
CA policy targeting the agent's user account
Incorrect
A policy for an agent's user account doesn't apply to the agent identity, and this agent doesn't use a user account.
DA sign-in frequency control for the employees who built the agent, so their sessions are reevaluated more often
Incorrect
The developers' sessions have nothing to do with the agent's own token requests.
Conditional Access evaluates the token subject. In on-behalf-of (delegated) access the signed-in user is the subject and user-targeted policies apply; in application-only access, used by autonomous agents, the agent identity is the subject and policies must target the agent identity or agent identity blueprint; in agent-user access the agent's user account is the subject. A policy targeting one subject doesn't apply to the others.
A bank wants a departing employee's access to Exchange Online, SharePoint Online and Teams cut off within minutes when HR disables the account, not when the current access token expires. It also wants access stopped quickly when a session moves from the corporate network to an unapproved IP address. Which two capabilities meet these requirements? (Choose TWO.)
AA Conditional Access sign-in frequency of one hour for all users, so that every session is reauthenticated regularly
BA Conditional Access policy that blocks legacy authentication protocols for every user
CCritical event evaluation in continuous access evaluation, which revokes sessions when an account is disabled or its password reset
DConditional Access location policies enforced in near real time through continuous access evaluation
EA shorter Microsoft Entra password expiry period, so that departing users' passwords stop working sooner
Show the answer and why
AA Conditional Access sign-in frequency of one hour for all users, so that every session is reauthenticated regularly
Incorrect
Sign-in frequency forces reauthentication on a schedule; it doesn't react within minutes to account disablement.
BA Conditional Access policy that blocks legacy authentication protocols for every user
Incorrect
Blocking legacy protocols is good practice but doesn't revoke modern sessions faster.
CCritical event evaluation in continuous access evaluation, which revokes sessions when an account is disabled or its password reset
Correct
CAE services subscribe to critical events and enforce them in near real time, without waiting for token expiry.
DConditional Access location policies enforced in near real time through continuous access evaluation
Correct
CAE-capable services enforce network location changes against Conditional Access location policies in near real time.
EA shorter Microsoft Entra password expiry period, so that departing users' passwords stop working sooner
Incorrect
Password expiry doesn't affect existing sessions when an account is disabled.
Continuous access evaluation lets services such as Exchange Online, SharePoint Online and Teams subscribe to critical Microsoft Entra events, such as account disablement or password change or reset, and enforce them in near real time. CAE also enforces Conditional Access location policies in near real time when the network location changes.
A retailer with on-premises Active Directory is choosing how users sign in to Microsoft Entra ID. Requirements: sign-in must keep working if the on-premises datacenter is unreachable, Microsoft Entra ID Protection must report leaked credentials, and the team wants the least infrastructure to run. Which method should the design use?
APass-through authentication with three agents on premises, so passwords are validated directly against Active Directory
BFederation with AD FS in the on-premises datacenter
CPassword hash synchronization, with seamless SSO where devices can't be Entra joined
DCloud-only accounts created by hand for every user
Show the answer and why
APass-through authentication with three agents on premises, so passwords are validated directly against Active Directory
Incorrect
PTA validates each sign-in against on-premises AD, so it depends on the datacenter being reachable.
BFederation with AD FS in the on-premises datacenter
Incorrect
Federation adds the most infrastructure and depends on the on-premises farm.
CPassword hash synchronization, with seamless SSO where devices can't be Entra joined
Correct
PHS needs the least infrastructure, doesn't depend on on-premises servers at sign-in, and is what ID Protection uses for leaked credentials.
DCloud-only accounts created by hand for every user
Incorrect
Separate cloud accounts break the hybrid identity and add work.
Password hash synchronization is the simplest way to enable cloud authentication for on-premises objects and requires the least deployment and maintenance effort. ID Protection requires PHS for the leaked credentials report, whatever the sign-in method. Pass-through authentication and federation depend on on-premises components at sign-in.
Engineers from a partner company sign in as B2B guests to your apps. Your Conditional Access policy requires MFA for guests, and the partner already enforces MFA in its own Microsoft Entra tenant. Guests complain about registering a second MFA method in your tenant. How should you meet the requirement without lowering security?
AExclude the partner's guests from the MFA policy
BConvert the guests to member users in your tenant
CAllow the guests to use SMS-based codes only
DConfigure the inbound trust settings for that partner to trust MFA from its tenant
Show the answer and why
AExclude the partner's guests from the MFA policy
Incorrect
Exclusion removes the MFA requirement instead of accepting the partner's MFA.
BConvert the guests to member users in your tenant
Incorrect
Changing user type doesn't remove the need for MFA registration in your tenant.
CAllow the guests to use SMS-based codes only
Incorrect
That lowers assurance and still makes them register in your tenant.
DConfigure the inbound trust settings for that partner to trust MFA from its tenant
Correct
Inbound trust settings let your Conditional Access policies accept MFA the user already performed in the home tenant.
Cross-tenant access settings include inbound trust settings that determine whether your Conditional Access policies trust MFA, compliant device and Microsoft Entra hybrid joined device claims from an external organization. When MFA is trusted, your MFA policies still apply, but users who completed MFA in their home tenant aren't prompted again.
Several Conditional Access Administrators sign in with standard MFA for daily work. Security wants an extra requirement only at the moment someone creates, updates or deletes a Conditional Access policy: they must then satisfy phishing-resistant MFA, even within an existing session. What should the design use?
AProtected actions that assign a Conditional Access authentication context to those permissions
BA Conditional Access policy requiring phishing-resistant MFA for every sign-in by these admins
CA PIM activation requirement for the Conditional Access Administrator role
DA custom role that removes the permission to delete policies
Show the answer and why
AProtected actions that assign a Conditional Access authentication context to those permissions
Correct
Protected actions attach Conditional Access policies to specific permissions, so the stronger requirement applies when the action is performed.
BA Conditional Access policy requiring phishing-resistant MFA for every sign-in by these admins
Incorrect
That raises every sign-in rather than the specific action, and doesn't step up within an existing session.
CA PIM activation requirement for the Conditional Access Administrator role
Incorrect
PIM governs role activation, not each policy change after activation.
DA custom role that removes the permission to delete policies
Incorrect
Removing the permission blocks the work instead of protecting it.
Protected actions in Microsoft Entra ID are permissions that have Conditional Access policies assigned through an authentication context. When a user tries to perform a protected action, such as creating or updating Conditional Access policies, they must first satisfy those policies, for example phishing-resistant MFA.
Microsoft Entra Cloud Sync synchronizes Active Directory to Microsoft Entra ID. What does it run on premises?
AA full Microsoft Entra Connect Sync server
BA lightweight provisioning agent that needs only outbound connections
CAn AD FS farm with web application proxies in the perimeter network
DNothing; the cloud service reads AD directly over the internet
Show the answer and why
AA full Microsoft Entra Connect Sync server
Incorrect
Connect Sync is the other synchronization engine, which organizations migrate from; Cloud Sync doesn't run it.
BA lightweight provisioning agent that needs only outbound connections
Correct
Cloud Sync uses the Microsoft Entra provisioning agent, which connects outbound and updates automatically.
CAn AD FS farm with web application proxies in the perimeter network
Incorrect
Federation servers aren't part of Cloud Sync.
DNothing; the cloud service reads AD directly over the internet
Incorrect
An on-premises agent bridges AD and Entra ID.
Microsoft Entra Cloud Sync uses the Microsoft Entra provisioning agent, a lightweight on-premises agent that acts as a secure bridge between Active Directory and Microsoft Entra ID, needs only outbound connections and gets automatic updates from the cloud. Several agents can run on different servers for automatic failover.
Microsoft Entra Verified ID implements decentralized identity. Which building blocks does it rely on?
ADecentralized identifiers and verifiable credentials
BKerberos tickets and domain trusts
CSAML assertions issued by AD FS
DShared API keys that each verifier stores and exchanges with the issuer
Show the answer and why
ADecentralized identifiers and verifiable credentials
Correct
Verified ID is based on DIDs and verifiable credentials standards.
BKerberos tickets and domain trusts
Incorrect
Those are Active Directory constructs.
CSAML assertions issued by AD FS
Incorrect
Federation tokens aren't decentralized identity.
DShared API keys that each verifier stores and exchanges with the issuer
Incorrect
Shared keys aren't part of decentralized identity.
Decentralized identity in Microsoft Entra Verified ID uses decentralized identifiers and verifiable credentials, so users hold credentials in a wallet and present them to verifiers.
Which Microsoft Authenticator feature makes users type a number shown on the sign-in screen, to counter MFA fatigue attacks?
ATemporary Access Pass
BNumber matching
CSelf-service password reset
DPassword writeback
Show the answer and why
ATemporary Access Pass
Incorrect
A Temporary Access Pass is a time-limited passcode for onboarding or recovery.
BNumber matching
Correct
Number matching asks users to enter the number displayed at sign-in.
CSelf-service password reset
Incorrect
SSPR lets users reset their own password.
DPassword writeback
Incorrect
Writeback syncs password changes to on-premises AD.
Number matching in Microsoft Authenticator push notifications requires users to enter the number displayed on the sign-in screen, which helps prevent accidental approvals in MFA fatigue attacks.
Which set lists the built-in authentication strengths that Conditional Access offers?
AMFA, passwordless MFA and phishing-resistant MFA
BPassword only, SMS only and email only
CLow, medium and high sign-in risk
DCompliant device, Microsoft Entra hybrid joined device and approved client app
Show the answer and why
AMFA, passwordless MFA and phishing-resistant MFA
Correct
These are the three built-in authentication strengths.
BPassword only, SMS only and email only
Incorrect
These aren't authentication strengths.
CLow, medium and high sign-in risk
Incorrect
Those are risk levels.
DCompliant device, Microsoft Entra hybrid joined device and approved client app
Incorrect
Those are other grant controls.
Conditional Access offers three built-in authentication strengths, multifactor authentication strength, passwordless MFA strength and phishing-resistant MFA strength, and you can create custom strengths.