SC-900 · Domain 2: Describe the capabilities of Microsoft Entra · 28% of the exam
Task 2.4: Describe identity protection and governance capabilities of Microsoft Entra
Microsoft Entra ID Governance and its lifecycles, entitlement management, access reviews, Privileged Identity Management and Microsoft Entra ID Protection.
Study it
Microsoft Entra ID Governance, lifecycle workflows and entitlement management
Lesson coming
Access reviews
Lesson coming
Privileged Identity Management
Lesson coming
Microsoft Entra ID Protection: sign-in risk and user risk
Lesson coming
Sample questions
Try each one before opening the answer. Every option is explained, with the Microsoft documentation page that proves it.
Question 1 · choose 1
When HR adds a new hire to Workday, the company wants her identity created automatically in both Microsoft Entra ID and Active Directory so that she can work on day one, and kept up to date from then on. Which Microsoft Entra ID Governance capability does this?
AAccess reviews
BPrivileged Identity Management
CInbound user provisioning
DAccess packages in entitlement management
Show the answer and why
AAccess reviews
Incorrect
Access reviews recertify access people already have; they don't create identities.
BPrivileged Identity Management
Incorrect
PIM controls just-in-time activation of privileged roles, not creation of identities.
CInbound user provisioning
Correct
Inbound provisioning maintains user identities in Microsoft Entra ID and Active Directory automatically from the HR system.
DAccess packages in entitlement management
Incorrect
Access packages bundle groups, app roles and sites that users get access to; the identity must already exist.
Identity lifecycle management models join, move and leave, and is often tied to an HR system such as Workday or SuccessFactors. Microsoft Entra ID Governance automates it with inbound provisioning from HR sources, lifecycle workflows, automatic assignment policies in entitlement management and user provisioning to other applications.
Over several years, project leads added guests directly to a Microsoft 365 group that holds business-sensitive files. The group must stay, but every quarter its owner must confirm, guest by guest, who still needs access, and the guests the owner doesn't confirm should lose it. What should the admin set up?
AAn expiration policy for the Microsoft 365 group
BA sensitivity label on the group that stops its owner adding guests
CA risk-based Conditional Access policy for guest users
DA recurring access review with the group owner as reviewer
Show the answer and why
AAn expiration policy for the Microsoft 365 group
Incorrect
An expiration policy has owners renew the whole group or let it expire; it doesn't ask them about each guest.
BA sensitivity label on the group that stops its owner adding guests
Incorrect
A label's external user access setting controls whether the owner can add guests; it doesn't remove guests who already have access or ask about each one.
CA risk-based Conditional Access policy for guest users
Incorrect
Risk-based policies respond to sign-ins or accounts that may be compromised, not to whether access is still needed.
DA recurring access review with the group owner as reviewer
Correct
Access reviews recur at set frequencies, and owners confirm guests' need; access can then be removed from those who no longer need it.
Microsoft Entra access reviews let organizations regularly confirm that only the right people keep access. A common use is asking group owners to confirm that guests still have a legitimate business need. Reviews can recur weekly, monthly, quarterly or annually, and results can be applied to remove access.
Auditors found that a dozen people hold administrator rights all the time. The company wants those rights to exist only when someone needs them, for a limited time, with approval from a designated person, a notification each time they're used and a history it can download. Which Microsoft Entra capability provides this?
AAccess reviews
BEntitlement management
CConditional Access
DPrivileged Identity Management
Show the answer and why
AAccess reviews
Incorrect
Access reviews periodically recertify who should keep access; they don't make rights exist only on demand.
BEntitlement management
Incorrect
Entitlement management bundles resources into access packages that users request; it isn't built around just-in-time activation of admin roles.
CConditional Access
Incorrect
Conditional Access evaluates signals at sign-in; it doesn't make administrator roles time-bound.
DPrivileged Identity Management
Correct
PIM is just in time, time-bound, approval-based, visible through notifications and auditable with a downloadable history.
Microsoft Entra Privileged Identity Management manages, controls and monitors access to important resources in Microsoft Entra ID, Azure and other Microsoft online services. It provides time-based and approval-based role activation, requires justification, enforces MFA on activation, sends notifications and keeps a full access history that can be downloaded.
A security analyst is sorting this week's events. Which two would Microsoft Entra ID Protection report as sign-in risk, the probability that a given authentication request isn't authorized by the identity owner? (Choose TWO.)
ASuspicious sending patterns from the user's mailbox
BA sign-in attempt that failed because the password was wrong
CA sign-in from an anonymous IP address
DSuspicious activity reported by the user
ESign-ins from two geographically distant locations too close together in time
Show the answer and why
ASuspicious sending patterns from the user's mailbox
Incorrect
Suspicious sending patterns are a user risk example: they suggest the account itself is compromised.
BA sign-in attempt that failed because the password was wrong
Incorrect
ID Protection generates risk detections only when correct credentials are used, so a wrong password isn't flagged.
CA sign-in from an anonymous IP address
Correct
An anonymous IP address is a sign-in risk example tied to one authentication request.
DSuspicious activity reported by the user
Incorrect
User reported suspicious activity is a user risk example.
ESign-ins from two geographically distant locations too close together in time
Correct
Atypical travel is a sign-in risk example.
ID Protection links risk detections to a sign-in event (sign-in risk) or to an individual user (user risk, the probability that the identity is compromised). Sign-in risk examples include anonymous IP addresses, atypical travel and unfamiliar sign-in properties. Detections are generated only when correct credentials are used.
Sales staff should become members of the Sales-Apps group automatically when the department attribute in their user profile changes to Sales, and leave it when the attribute changes again. What should the admin configure?
AA group with assigned membership that its owner maintains
BA quarterly access review of the group
CA group with a dynamic membership rule that Microsoft Entra ID evaluates
DAn access package that Sales staff request in My Access
Show the answer and why
AA group with assigned membership that its owner maintains
Incorrect
Assigned membership means members are selected by hand, so changes wouldn't follow the attribute.
BA quarterly access review of the group
Incorrect
An access review recertifies membership periodically; it doesn't add members when their department changes.
CA group with a dynamic membership rule that Microsoft Entra ID evaluates
Correct
Dynamic membership rules add and remove identities automatically as attributes change.
DAn access package that Sales staff request in My Access
Incorrect
A request-based access package waits for each user to ask, so membership wouldn't follow the attribute by itself.
Groups in Microsoft Entra ID can have assigned membership, where members are selected manually, or dynamic membership, where rules on attributes add and remove identities automatically. When a user's attributes change, the system evaluates the dynamic group rules to decide whether the user is added or removed.
Which question is among the four that Microsoft Entra ID Governance helps organizations answer?
AWhich identities should have access to which resources?
BWhich emails contain phishing links?
CWhich devices are missing security updates?
DWhich cloud apps are employees signing up for without IT's approval?
Show the answer and why
AWhich identities should have access to which resources?
Correct
ID Governance addresses who should access what, what they do with it, the controls in place and whether auditors can verify them.
BWhich emails contain phishing links?
Incorrect
Phishing protection is a Defender for Office 365 concern.
CWhich devices are missing security updates?
Incorrect
Device vulnerabilities are a Defender Vulnerability Management concern.
DWhich cloud apps are employees signing up for without IT's approval?
Incorrect
Unapproved cloud apps aren't one of identity governance's four questions.
Microsoft Entra ID Governance helps organizations answer four questions for access across services and applications: Which identities should have access to which resources? What are those identities doing with that access? Are there organizational controls for managing access? Can auditors verify that the controls are working?
Which set of access can Microsoft Entra access reviews recertify?
AOnly privileged roles managed in PIM
BOnly guest accounts in Microsoft 365 groups
CGroup memberships, access to enterprise applications and role assignments
DOnly passwords that are about to expire
Show the answer and why
AOnly privileged roles managed in PIM
Incorrect
Role assignments can be reviewed, but so can group memberships and application access.
BOnly guest accounts in Microsoft 365 groups
Incorrect
Access reviews aren't limited to guest accounts.
CGroup memberships, access to enterprise applications and role assignments
Correct
Access reviews manage group memberships, enterprise app access and role assignments.
DOnly passwords that are about to expire
Incorrect
Access reviews recertify access, not passwords.
Microsoft Entra access reviews let organizations efficiently manage group memberships, access to enterprise applications and role assignments, so that only the right people keep access.
Where does the data behind Microsoft Entra ID Protection's risk detections come from?
AOnly the sign-in logs of the customer's own tenant
BTrillions of daily signals from Microsoft Entra ID, Microsoft Accounts and Xbox
CThird-party threat intelligence feeds that the customer must buy and connect first
DEndpoint sensors that Defender for Endpoint installs
Show the answer and why
AOnly the sign-in logs of the customer's own tenant
Incorrect
ID Protection draws on far broader signals than one tenant's logs.
BTrillions of daily signals from Microsoft Entra ID, Microsoft Accounts and Xbox
Correct
This broad range of signals lets ID Protection detect anonymous IPs, password spray, leaked credentials and more.
CThird-party threat intelligence feeds that the customer must buy and connect first
Incorrect
No connection is needed; the detections come from Microsoft's own signals.
DEndpoint sensors that Defender for Endpoint installs
Incorrect
Defender for Endpoint signals come from devices; ID Protection analyzes identity signals.
Microsoft Entra ID Protection's detections come from the analysis of trillions of signals each day from Microsoft Entra ID, Microsoft Accounts and Xbox. That breadth helps it detect risky behaviors such as anonymous IP address use, password spray attacks and leaked credentials.
Which three reports does Microsoft Entra ID Protection give administrators for investigating risk?
ASign-in logs, audit logs and provisioning logs
BSecure score, compliance score and regulatory compliance
CRisky devices, risky apps and risky mailboxes
DRisk detections, risky sign-ins and risky users
Show the answer and why
ASign-in logs, audit logs and provisioning logs
Incorrect
These are Microsoft Entra monitoring logs, not ID Protection's risk reports.
BSecure score, compliance score and regulatory compliance
Incorrect
These are posture and compliance measures from other products.
CRisky devices, risky apps and risky mailboxes
Incorrect
ID Protection reports cover identities and sign-ins, not devices, apps or mailboxes.
DRisk detections, risky sign-ins and risky users
Correct
Each risk is a risk detection, a sign-in with detections is a risky sign-in, and an affected user is a risky user.
ID Protection tracks detected risks with three reports: risk detections (each risk detected), risky sign-ins (sign-ins with one or more risk detections) and risky users (users with risky sign-ins or risk detections). Investigating them helps find weak points in the security strategy.