SC-200 · Domain 2: Respond to security incidents · 37% of the exam
Task 2.1: Respond to alerts and incidents in Microsoft Defender XDR
Email threats in Defender for Office 365, Purview, Defender for Cloud and Defender for Cloud Apps alerts, compromised identities in Entra ID and Defender for Identity, Sentinel incidents, Security Copilot and its agents, multi-stage attacks, and case management.
Study it
Email threats in Defender for Office 365: Explorer, AIR, ZAP and remediation
Lesson coming
Purview DLP and insider risk alerts in the Defender portal
Try each one before opening the answer. Every option is explained, with the Microsoft documentation page that proves it.
Question 1 · choose 1
Policy requires two people for any bulk email deletion. A tier 1 analyst finds 300 phishing messages in Threat Explorer and must queue them for soft delete, and a tier 2 lead must approve before anything moves. How do you set this up?
AThe analyst selects Soft delete directly and the lead reviews the Action center History tab afterward
BThe analyst uses Add to remediation, and the lead approves it with the Search and Purge role
CThe analyst starts an automated investigation, which always deletes the cluster after the lead's comment
DThe analyst selects Delete sender's copy, which holds the action for the lead
Show the answer and why
AThe analyst selects Soft delete directly and the lead reviews the Action center History tab afterward
Incorrect
Direct approval runs the action at once, so nothing waits for the lead.
BThe analyst uses Add to remediation, and the lead approves it with the Search and Purge role
Correct
Add to remediation creates a pending item that someone with the approval permission must approve.
CThe analyst starts an automated investigation, which always deletes the cluster after the lead's comment
Incorrect
AIR proposes actions for approval; a comment doesn't approve anything.
DThe analyst selects Delete sender's copy, which holds the action for the lead
Incorrect
Delete sender's copy is an extra delete option, not an approval step.
In Explorer, users can take direct action or use the two-step approval path: Add to remediation places the messages in a remediation container that appears on the Action center Pending tab. Approval needs the Search and Purge role (or Email & collaboration advanced actions in unified RBAC). After approval the action moves to the History tab.
On Thursday, Microsoft updates its verdict on a file that was attached to messages delivered on Monday, and the file is now known malware. The anti-malware policy has ZAP turned on. Users still have the messages in their inboxes on Thursday afternoon. What should the SOC do?
ANothing; ZAP quarantines the messages within the next day
BTurn on ZAP for malware in the anti-spam policy
CAdd the file hash to the Tenant Allow/Block List and wait for ZAP
DFind the messages in Threat Explorer and remediate them
Show the answer and why
ANothing; ZAP quarantines the messages within the next day
Incorrect
ZAP's search covers only the last 48 hours of delivered email.
BTurn on ZAP for malware in the anti-spam policy
Incorrect
ZAP for malware is set in anti-malware policies and is already on.
CAdd the file hash to the Tenant Allow/Block List and wait for ZAP
Incorrect
A block entry affects new mail; ZAP still won't reach messages delivered three days ago.
DFind the messages in Threat Explorer and remediate them
Correct
Messages older than ZAP's 48-hour window must be remediated manually.
ZAP retroactively acts on malicious messages, but its search is limited to the last 48 hours of delivered email. Messages delivered earlier need manual remediation, for example by selecting them in Threat Explorer and soft deleting them.
A partner's portal URL is in mail that Defender for Office 365 now quarantines as high confidence phishing. After review, the SOC is certain the URL is clean and needs mail with it delivered while Microsoft reviews the verdict. How do you create the allow?
ASubmit the URL on the Submissions page, select I've confirmed it's clean, then select Allow this URL
BAdd a URL allow entry directly in the Tenant Allow/Block List
CRelease each message from quarantine as it arrives
DAdd the URL to the advanced delivery policy as a simulation URL
Show the answer and why
ASubmit the URL on the Submissions page, select I've confirmed it's clean, then select Allow this URL
Correct
For high confidence phishing verdicts, allow entries come from the Submissions page.
BAdd a URL allow entry directly in the Tenant Allow/Block List
Incorrect
Allow entries can't be created directly for high confidence phishing verdicts.
CRelease each message from quarantine as it arrives
Incorrect
Releasing messages doesn't stop new ones from being quarantined.
DAdd the URL to the advanced delivery policy as a simulation URL
Incorrect
Advanced delivery is for non-Microsoft phishing simulation URLs, not partner portals.
Allow entries for URLs, domains, email addresses and files with malware or high confidence phishing verdicts can't be added directly to the Tenant Allow/Block List. Submit the item on the Submissions page, mark it as confirmed clean, and choose Allow this URL to create the allow entry.
Since early October 2026, Microsoft Purview DLP policy matches no longer appear in the Defender XDR incident queue, although the policies still generate alerts in Purview. Neither the policies nor the analysts' role assignments changed. Analysts can still find the signals in BehaviorInfo. The SOC wants them back as alerts in Defender. What should you do?
ATurn on alerts in each DLP policy again
BAssign the analysts the Information Protection Analyst role
CDisable the built-in DLP alert tuning rule in Settings > Microsoft Defender XDR > Alert tuning
DCreate a custom detection on BehaviorInfo for each DLP policy
Show the answer and why
ATurn on alerts in each DLP policy again
Incorrect
The policies still raise alerts; the change happened on the Defender side.
BAssign the analysts the Information Protection Analyst role
Incorrect
Missing roles would hide the alerts from some users, not turn them into behaviors.
CDisable the built-in DLP alert tuning rule in Settings > Microsoft Defender XDR > Alert tuning
Correct
That built-in rule now sets DLP signals as behaviors instead of alerts.
DCreate a custom detection on BehaviorInfo for each DLP policy
Incorrect
It rebuilds alerts by hand instead of removing the rule that suppresses them.
A built-in alert tuning rule for DLP signals took effect in early October 2026. It sets DLP signals as behaviors, so they don't generate alerts in Defender XDR and stay available in BehaviorInfo and BehaviorEntities. To keep seeing DLP signals as alerts, disable that rule.
A known vulnerability scanner triggers the same Defender for Cloud alert type in 40 subscriptions under one management group. The cloud team wants one suppression that covers the whole management group. How do you create it?
ACreate a suppression rule on the Security alerts page and select the management group
BAssign the suppression through Azure Policy at the management group
CCreate an alert tuning rule in the Defender portal with the Hide alert action
DDismiss the alerts each day with the bulk Change status option
Show the answer and why
ACreate a suppression rule on the Security alerts page and select the management group
Incorrect
The portal and REST API create suppression rules for subscriptions.
BAssign the suppression through Azure Policy at the management group
Correct
Suppressing alerts for a management group is done with Azure Policy.
CCreate an alert tuning rule in the Defender portal with the Hide alert action
Incorrect
Hide alert applies only to Defender for Endpoint alerts.
DDismiss the alerts each day with the bulk Change status option
Incorrect
Bulk status changes don't stop future alerts.
Defender for Cloud suppression rules dismiss matching alerts. They can be applied to management groups through Azure Policy, or to subscriptions in the Azure portal or the REST API. A rule applies only to alert types that have triggered at least once.
An activity policy in Defender for Cloud Apps suspends a compromised user, but within the hour the user is active again. The account is synced from on-premises Active Directory to Microsoft Entra ID, and the Defender for Identity sensor runs on every domain controller. How do you keep the account disabled?
ADisable the account in Active Directory, for example with the Defender for Identity Disable action
BRun Suspend user again with Notify additional users
CUse Require user to sign in again on the account
DUse Confirm user compromised so the policy suspends permanently
Show the answer and why
ADisable the account in Active Directory, for example with the Defender for Identity Disable action
Correct
On-premises settings override Entra for synced users, so the account must be disabled at the source.
BRun Suspend user again with Notify additional users
Incorrect
Notifications don't stop the sync from reverting the suspension.
CUse Require user to sign in again on the account
Incorrect
It signs the user out but leaves the account enabled.
DUse Confirm user compromised so the policy suspends permanently
Incorrect
It raises the user's risk level in Entra; the account still syncs as enabled from AD.
When Microsoft Entra ID syncs users from on-premises Active Directory, the on-premises settings override Entra settings and the Suspend user governance action is reverted. Disable the account in Active Directory; Defender for Identity can do this with its Disable action.
You confirm in Microsoft Entra ID Protection that a user is compromised. Evidence shows the attacker registered their own authenticator app on the account, so they can complete MFA. Which two actions should you take next? (Choose TWO.)
ADismiss the user's risk so the policy stops prompting
BBlock the user from signing in
CRequire the user to change the password at the next sign-in
DExclude the user from the user risk policy during the investigation
ERevoke the user's refresh tokens
Show the answer and why
ADismiss the user's risk so the policy stops prompting
Incorrect
Dismissing removes the risk without securing the account.
BBlock the user from signing in
Correct
Blocking is advised when the attacker can reset the password or do MFA.
CRequire the user to change the password at the next sign-in
Incorrect
A password change after MFA can be completed by the attacker who controls the MFA method.
DExclude the user from the user risk policy during the investigation
Incorrect
Exclusion removes protection from a confirmed compromised account.
ERevoke the user's refresh tokens
Correct
Revoking refresh tokens ends existing sessions the attacker holds.
After confirming compromise, if a risk policy didn't remediate the user, take actions such as requesting a password change, blocking the user if you suspect the attacker can reset the password or do MFA, revoking refresh tokens, and disabling compromised devices.
A Defender for Identity alert shows an on-premises account used for lateral movement. You select Disable on the identity page, but the action fails for the Active Directory account. In that forest, sensors are installed only on the AD FS and Microsoft Entra Connect servers. What must change?
AConfigure a gMSA action account on the AD FS sensor
BTurn on Unified RBAC for identities
CMark the user as compromised in Microsoft Entra ID first
DInstall a sensor on a domain controller in that domain
Show the answer and why
AConfigure a gMSA action account on the AD FS sensor
Incorrect
Sensors on AD FS servers don't perform remediation actions.
BTurn on Unified RBAC for identities
Incorrect
Permissions affect who can start an action, not which sensor executes it.
CMark the user as compromised in Microsoft Entra ID first
Incorrect
Marking compromised acts in Entra ID and doesn't disable the AD account.
DInstall a sensor on a domain controller in that domain
Correct
Active Directory actions are executed by sensors on domain controllers.
Defender for Identity runs Active Directory remediation actions through the sensor on a domain controller, using the domain controller's local system account. Sensors on AD FS, AD CS or Microsoft Entra Connect servers don't perform remediation actions.
Two incidents share the same compromised mailbox and attacker IP, but Defender didn't merge them. One is assigned to Ana and the other to Raj. Both are active and have the same classification. How do you bring them together while keeping their activity logs?
AMove each alert from one incident to the other
BClose one incident so the engine merges it into the other
CRemove the assignment from one incident, then merge them manually
DGive both incidents the same tag and wait for correlation
Show the answer and why
AMove each alert from one incident to the other
Incorrect
Merging is preferred because moving alerts doesn't keep all the incident information.
BClose one incident so the engine merges it into the other
Incorrect
Closed incidents aren't merged.
CRemove the assignment from one incident, then merge them manually
Correct
Different assignees block merging; after that's fixed, a manual merge keeps the incident history.
DGive both incidents the same tag and wait for correlation
Incorrect
Tags don't drive the merge decision.
Defender doesn't merge incidents that are assigned to two different people, closed, or differently classified. After fixing the cause, merge them manually; merging keeps information such as the activity log, which moving alerts doesn't. Up to five incidents can be merged at a time.
You set up the Security Copilot Phishing Triage Agent. Defender for Office 365 Plan 2, unified RBAC for Defender for Office 365, user reported settings and the alert policy Email reported by user as malware or phish are all in place, and SCUs are provisioned. User reports raise alerts, but the agent never triages any. What's the likely cause?
AThe agent needs the Defender for Endpoint plugin enabled
BThe built-in Auto-Resolve rule for user-reported phish resolves the alerts first
CUser reports must go to Microsoft only, not to a reporting mailbox
DAnalysts need Security Administrator to see the agent's verdicts
Show the answer and why
AThe agent needs the Defender for Endpoint plugin enabled
Incorrect
The agent activates the Defender XDR, Threat Intelligence and agent plugins itself.
BThe built-in Auto-Resolve rule for user-reported phish resolves the alerts first
Correct
The agent doesn't triage alerts resolved by alert tuning.
CUser reports must go to Microsoft only, not to a reporting mailbox
Incorrect
Any of the reported message destinations works.
DAnalysts need Security Administrator to see the agent's verdicts
Incorrect
Viewing results needs the same permissions as the agent; Security Administrator is for managing settings.
The Phishing Triage Agent works on alerts of type Email reported by user as malware or phish. It doesn't triage alerts that alert tuning has resolved, so the built-in Auto-Resolve - Email reported by user as malware or phish rule and any custom tuning rules that resolve this alert must be disabled.
The SOC uses generic cases in the Defender portal to track work that isn't tied to an incident. A coordinator must create cases, assign them and update their properties, but must not change case templates or SLA policies. Which unified RBAC permission fits?
ASecurity operations > Alerts (manage)
BSecurity operations > Security data basics (read)
CAuthorization and settings > Core security settings (manage)
DSecurity Data Manage on incident cases only
Show the answer and why
ASecurity operations > Alerts (manage)
Correct
It lets the user create and manage generic cases and tasks.
BSecurity operations > Security data basics (read)
Incorrect
It only lets the user view cases, tasks and comments.
CAuthorization and settings > Core security settings (manage)
Incorrect
It also configures templates, custom fields and SLA policies.
DSecurity Data Manage on incident cases only
Incorrect
Incident case permissions don't cover generic cases.
Generic cases use their own permissions: Security data basics (read) or Microsoft Sentinel Reader to view, Alerts (manage) or Microsoft Sentinel Responder to create and manage cases, and Core security settings (manage) or Microsoft Sentinel Contributor to configure case templates, custom fields and SLA policies.
You remediate a suspicious message from Threat Explorer and want users to be able to recover it if it turns out to be legitimate. Which action do you choose?
AHard delete
BSoft delete
CDelete sender's copy only
DMove to inbox
Show the answer and why
AHard delete
Incorrect
Hard delete purges the message, so users can't recover it.
BSoft delete
Correct
Soft delete moves the message to Recoverable Items\Deletions, where users and admins can recover it.
CDelete sender's copy only
Incorrect
It acts on the sender's Sent Items, not the recipients' copies.
DMove to inbox
Incorrect
It leaves the message in front of users.
Soft delete removes the message from the Deleted Items folder into the Recoverable Items\Deletions folder, where the user and admins can recover it. Hard delete purges the message, so users can't recover it.
While reviewing a Defender for Cloud alert on a storage account, you want to run the existing logic app that opens a ticket for the resource owner. Where in the alert do you start it?
ATake action > Trigger automated response
BTake action > Prevent future attacks
CTake action > Suppress similar alerts
DAlert details > Inspect resource context
Show the answer and why
ATake action > Trigger automated response
Correct
This section triggers a logic app as a response to the alert.
BTake action > Prevent future attacks
Incorrect
It lists security recommendations to harden the resource.
CTake action > Suppress similar alerts
Incorrect
It creates a suppression rule.
DAlert details > Inspect resource context
Incorrect
It opens the resource's activity logs.
The Take action tab of a Defender for Cloud alert offers Inspect resource context, Mitigate the threat, Prevent future attacks, Trigger automated response (run a logic app) and Suppress similar alerts.
After investigation, a user's high-risk sign-ins were a business trip the user had reported. A SOC analyst must dismiss the user risk, using the least privileged role. Which role?
AUser Administrator
BConditional Access Administrator
CGlobal Administrator
DSecurity Operator
Show the answer and why
AUser Administrator
Incorrect
It isn't the role ID Protection requires for dismissing user risk.
BConditional Access Administrator
Incorrect
It manages Conditional Access policies.
CGlobal Administrator
Incorrect
It works but is far more privileged than needed.
DSecurity Operator
Correct
It's the least privileged role required to dismiss user risk.
In Microsoft Entra ID Protection, Security Operator is the least privileged role to dismiss user risk, Security Administrator to create or edit risk-based policies, and Conditional Access Administrator to manage Conditional Access policies.
Security Copilot guided responses on an incident page are grouped into categories. In which category does the recommendation to classify the incident as a true positive or false positive appear?
AContainment
BRemediation
CTriage
DInvestigation
Show the answer and why
AContainment
Incorrect
Containment recommends actions that contain the incident.
BRemediation
Incorrect
Remediation recommends actions on specific entities.
CTriage
Correct
Triage includes the recommendation to classify the incident.
DInvestigation
Incorrect
Investigation recommends further investigative steps.
Copilot in Defender generates guided responses when you open an incident page. They fall into Triage (classify the incident as informational, true positive or false positive), Containment, Investigation and Remediation.