Question 1 · choose 1
A portfolio assessment of 400 on-premises applications shows 35 applications whose servers averaged under 5% CPU and memory use for the last 90 days and that received no inbound connections in that time. The business confirms that nobody needs them. Which migration strategy should the company assign to these applications?
- ARehost, so that they move quickly to Amazon EC2 without changes
- BRetain, so that they stay in the data center until a later wave
- CRetire, so that their servers are shut down and the data archived where needed
- DRelocate, so that the servers move as they are to a cloud version of their platform
Show the answer and why
ARehost, so that they move quickly to Amazon EC2 without changes
Incorrect
Rehosting moves applications unchanged, which would carry unused applications into AWS and keep paying to host them.
BRetain, so that they stay in the data center until a later wave
Incorrect
Retain keeps applications in the source environment for now, for example because of compliance, risk or dependencies. It still keeps them running and costing money.
CRetire, so that their servers are shut down and the data archived where needed
Correct
Retire is the strategy for applications with no business value; AWS guidance names applications with very low use and no inbound connections for 90 days as candidates.
DRelocate, so that the servers move as they are to a cloud version of their platform
Incorrect
Relocating still moves and runs the applications, only on a different platform, so it keeps paying for something nobody uses.
Not every application should move. Unused applications found in the assessment are retired, which also shrinks the migration.
AWS documentation