Question 1 · choose 1
An insurer's engineering team reports hallucination rate, answer relevancy and latency for its claims-summary assistant. The executive sponsor says the reports do not show whether the project is worth its budget. What should the AI program manager introduce?
- AA larger set of technical metrics, so that the sponsor sees the full picture
- BA framework that traces each technical metric to a measurable business goal
- CA single overall satisfaction survey of the assistant's users
- DA comparison of the assistant's benchmark scores with competitors' published scores
Show the answer and why
AA larger set of technical metrics, so that the sponsor sees the full picture
Incorrect
More technical metrics deepen the engineering view but still leave the gap between technical performance and business value.
BA framework that traces each technical metric to a measurable business goal
Correct
AWS recommends a structured framework such as Objectives, Goals, Strategies and Measures (OGSM) so that every technical measurement is traceable to a meaningful business outcome, creating a shared language.
CA single overall satisfaction survey of the assistant's users
Incorrect
User satisfaction is one useful measure, but on its own it does not connect the engineering metrics to the business goals and budget.
DA comparison of the assistant's benchmark scores with competitors' published scores
Incorrect
Benchmark comparisons describe model capability in general, not the business result this assistant delivers for the insurer.
Technical metrics disconnected from business impact are a common failure point. Linking objectives to quantified goals, the strategies that reach them and the measures that track them lets executives and engineers talk about the same results.
AWS documentation